Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://bdtd.fuv.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/prefix/458
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.advisor1Rocha, Abdruschin Schaeffer-
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9784869378559613pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Rocha, Abdruschin Schaeffer-
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9784869378559613pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Ulrich, Claudete Beise-
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9944681145159594pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Brotto, Julio Cezar de Paula-
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1572132876854513pt_BR
dc.creatorGazolli Junior, Geraldo Moysés-
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1973698944371559pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T16:38:38Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-22-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T16:38:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bdtd.faculdadeunida.com.br:8080/jspui/handle/prefix/458-
dc.description.abstractThis work aims to present the current dynamics between neo-Darwinism and Intelligent Design Theory (ID). An analysis of the narrative of both lines of thought shows an influence in the university field. Both lines of thought, if not considered, can harm the scientific process. For an analysis of the main epistemological bridges and frontiers, we sought to analyze the historical aspect from Antiquity to the current scenario of how these competing sources of thought can be understood. This work is divided into three chapters, each chapter containing three subsections. The first chapter forms the approach of neo-Darwinism, with a historical and epistemological trace, the same procedure occurs with ID. The last subsection of the first and second chapters address the contributions and limits of each narrative. In the third and last chapter, these views are analyzed from the perspective of the university field and the scientific knowledge of this space. For this, the methodologies of Maingueneau, Bruner, Lakatos, Popper and Freire were used. Being the same inclusive regarding narrative participation in the university but respecting the proper fields and their essences of study. It was possible to perceive those narratives have their space, but if not aligned and reduced to their own field of action, this narrative can influence or even retain fields that should not belong to anyone, such as the field of science.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoO presente trabalho possui o objetivo de apresentar a dinâmica atual entre neodarwinismo e a Teoria do Design Inteligente (TDI). Uma análise da narrativa de ambas as correntes de pensamento evidencia uma influência no campo universitário. As duas linhas de pensamento, se não consideradas, podem causar prejuízos ao devido processo científico. Para uma análise das principais pontes e fronteiras epistemológicas buscou-se analisar o aspecto histórico desde a Antiguidade até o cenário atual de como se entendem as concorrentes fontes de pensamento. O trabalho está dividido em três capítulos, cada capítulo contendo três subseções. O primeiro capítulo forma a abordagem do neodarwinismo, com um rastreio histórico e epistemológico, o mesmo procedimento ocorre com a TDI. A última subseção do primeiro e segundo capítulos abordam as contribuições e os limites de cada narrativa. No terceiro e último capítulo esses panoramas são analisados desde a perspectiva do campo universitário e o saber científico nato desse espaço. Para isso utilizaram-se as metodologias de Maingueneau, Bruner, Lakatos, Popper e Freire. Sendo essas me mesmas inclusivas no que diz respeito a participação narrativa na universidade, mas sendo respeitados os devidos campos e suas essências de estudo. Foi possível perceber que as narrativas têm seu espaço, mas se não alinhadas e reduzidas ao seu próprio campo de ação, essa narrativa pode influenciar ou mesmo fidelizar campos que não deveriam pertencer a ninguém, como o campo da ciência.pt_BR
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Mestrado Estagiário (estagiario.mestrado@fuv.edu.br) on 2022-07-06T16:38:38Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TCC - Geraldo Moysés Gazolli Junior.pdf: 18724523 bytes, checksum: 0990e72ebc9ef602ac65cc521bcfdf21 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-07-06T16:38:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TCC - Geraldo Moysés Gazolli Junior.pdf: 18724523 bytes, checksum: 0990e72ebc9ef602ac65cc521bcfdf21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-12-22en
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentCiências da Religiõespt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências das Religiõespt_BR
dc.relation.referencesABDALLA, Maurício. La crisis latente del darwinismo. Asclepio, Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia, v. LVIII, n. 1, p. 43-94, 2006. ADAMI, C. What is Complexity? BioEssays, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 1085-1094, 2002. AHBEL-RAPPE, Sara. Socrates: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Continuum, 2009. AHBEL-RAPPE, Sara; KAMTEKAR, R. (eds.). A Companion to Socrates. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2009. ALSTON, Jon P. The Scientific Case against Creationism. New York: Universe Press, 2003. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (AAAS) [site institucional]. Statement on the Teaching of Evolution. Washington, DC, 16 fev. 2006. Disponível em: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/0219boardstatement.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021. ANANTHASWAMY, Anil. Is the Universe Fine-Tuned for Life? In: PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE [site institucional], 2012. Disponível em: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2012/03/is-the-universe-fine-tuned-for-life/. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2021. ARISTOTELES. History of Animals. In: CLASSICS [site institucional]. Disponível em: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/history_anim.1.i.html#223. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021. ARISTOTELES. Physics. Tomo II. In: CLASSICS [site institucional]. Disponível em: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.2.ii.html#604. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021. ASHRAF, Faheem. Islamic Concept of Creation of Universe Big Bang and Science-Religion Interaction. In: IRFI.ORG [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://www.irfi.org/articles2/articles_3951_4000/islamic%20concept%20of%20creation%20of%20universehtml.htm. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021. AUGUSTINE of Hippo. City of God. New York: Penguin, 2004. AYER, A. J. Language, Truth and Logic. Nova York: Dover Publications, 1952. BACON, Francis. Novum Organum. New York: Collier & Son, 1902. BARUCH, A. Shalev. 100 Years of Nobel Prizes. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 2003. BECCALONI, George. On the Terms “Darwinism” and “Neo-darwinism”. In: WALLACE MEMORIAL FUND (WMF) [site institucional]. 2013. Disponível em: http://wallacefund.info/ terms-darwinism-and-neo-darwinism. Acesso em: 01 dez. 2020. BEHE, Michael. Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press, 2006. BEHE, Michael. Molecular Machines: Experimental Support for the Design Inference. In: ARCHIVE TOTAY [site institucional], [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://archive.is/20120801101947/http://www.apologetics.org/MolecularMachines/tabid/99/Default.aspx. Acesso em: 17 abr. 2021. BECK Julie. Lifes Stories. In: THE ATLANTIC [site institucional]. 2016. Disponível em: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/08/life-stories-narrative-psychology-redemption-mental-health/400796/. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2021. BENGSON, John. Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. BENNETT, K.; MCLAUGHLIN, B. Supervenience. In: STANFORD ENCICLOPAEDIA [site institucional]. 2011. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2021. BJØRN, Grinde. Darwinian Happiness: Evolution as a Guide for Living and Understanding Human Behavior. Noruega: Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 2002. BOWLER, Peter J. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. BOWLER, Peter J. The Eclipse of Darwinism: anti-Darwinian evolutionary theories in the decades around 1900. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1983. BRASIL. Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional (Lei n. 9394 de 1996). Brasília: Senado, 2005. BRENAN, Megan. 40% of Americans Believe in Creationism. In: GALLUP [site institucional], 2017. Disponível em: https://news.gallup.com/poll/261680/americans-believe-creationism.aspx. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021. BRICKHOUSE, Thomas. Plato. In: INTERNET ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY [site institucional], 2005. Disponível em: http://www.iep.utm.edu/plato/. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021. BRITANNIA Encyclopedia [site institucional]. Georges Lemaître. Chicago, 1998. Disponível em: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Georges-Lemaitre. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2021. BROOKE, John Hedley. Darwinism and Religion: A Revisionist View of the Wilberforce-Huxley Debate. Science & Christian Belief, Cambrige, v. 13, n. 2, p. 127-141, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/cis/brooke/. Acesso em: 03 dez. 2020. BRUNER, Jerome. Realidade mental, mundos possíveis. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1986. BRUNER, Jerome. Actual minds, possible Worlds. Cambridge. Harvard University Press, 1986, BULMER, M. G. Francis. Galton: Pioneer of Heredity and Biometry. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2003. BURIAN, Richard. The Influence of the Evolutionary Paradigm. In: HECHT, Max K. (ed.). Evolutionary Biology at the Crossroads. Flushing: Queens College Press, 1989. p. 149-166. BURKE, A. M; AKIS, R; DAY, T. E; SPEYER, Gil; FERRY, D. K; BENNETT, B. R. Periodic Scarred States in Open Quantum Dots as Evidence of Quantum Darwinism. Physical Review Letters, [s.l.], v. 104, n. 17, p. 1-4, 2010. BUSS, David M. Evolutionary Psychology. In: BUSS LAB [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/Group/BussLAB/pdffiles/prefs_ mate_selection_1986_jpsp.pdf. Acesso em: 30 dez. 2020. CANNON, H. Brevy. Richard Dawkins: Universal DNA Code is 'Knockdown' Evidence of Evolution. In: UVAToday [site institucional]. 19 out. 2009. Disponível em: https://news.virginia.edu/content/richard-dawkins-universal-dna-code-knockdown-evidence-evolution. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2021. CARROL, William E. Creation, Evolution, and Thomas Aquinas. Revue des Questions Scientifiques, v. 171, n. 4, p. 319-347, 2000. Dísponivel em: https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/science/faith-and-science/creation-evolution-and-thomas-aquinas.html Acesso em: 02 dez. 2020. CHALYBAUS, Heinrich Moritz. Historiche Entwicklung der spekulativen Philosophie von Kant bis Hegel. Dresden: Forgotten Books, 1837. CHIGNELL, Andrew. Natural Theology and Natural Religion. In: THE STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/natural-theology/. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021. CICERO. De Natura Deorum. Massachussetts: Harvard University Press, 1951. COLLINS, Francis S. Building Bridges. Nature, [s.l.], v. 442, p. 110, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/442110a. Acesso em: 04 dez. 2020. CORBETT, Edward P. J. Classical Rethoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. COX, R. T. Probability, Frequency, and Reasonable Expectation. American Journal of Physics, [s.l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-10, 1946. CRIACIONISMO [site institucional]. Unicamp cancela fórum sobre as origens. São Paulo, 14 out. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.criacionismo.com.br/2013/10/unicamp-cancela-forum-sobre-as-origens.html. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2021. CZERKAS, A.; FEDUCCIA, A. Jurassic archosaur is a non-dinossaurian Bird. Journal of Ornitology, p. 841-855, 2014. DARWIN, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859a. DARWIN, Charles. Carta 2570. Destinatário: John Murray. [s.l.], 1859b. Disponível em: http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/darwinletters/calendar/entry-2570.html. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021. DARWIN, Charles. Carta 2542. Destinatário: J, D. HOOKER. [s.l.], 1859c. 1 carta. DARWIN, Charles. Carta 5145. Destinatário: WALLACE, [s.l.], 1866. Disponível em: http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-5145#back-mark-5145.f5. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021. DARWIN, Charles. The Descent of Man. London: John Murray, 1871a. DARWIN, Charles. Pangenesis. Nature, [s.l.], v. 3, n. 78, p. 502-503, 1871b. DARWIN, Charles. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin. London: Collins, 1958. DARWIN, Charles. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. London: John Murray, 1992. DATAFOLHA [site institucional]. 59% acreditam na evolução entre as espécies, sob o comando de Deus. Opinião Pública, São Paulo, 05 abr. 2010. Disponível em: https://datafolha.folha.uol.com.br/opiniaopublica/2010/04/1223573-59-acreditam-na-evolucao-entre-as-especies-sob-o-comando-de-deus.shtml. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2021. DAWKINS, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976. DAWKINS, Richard. The future looks bright. London: The Guardian, 2003. DE TIEGE, Alexis; TANGHE, Koen; BRAECKMAN, Johan; VAN DE PEER, Yves. From DNA to NA centrism and the Conditions for Gene-centrism Revisited. Biology and Philosophy, [s.l.], v. 29, n.1, p. 55-69, 2014. Disponível em: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/4100988. Acesso em: 15 set. 2020. DEICHMANN, Ute; TRAVIS, Anthony S. Darwinism, Philosophy, and Experimental Biology. New York: Springer, 2010. Disponível em: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/ 57779/1/68.pdf.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021. DEMBSKI, William A. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity cannot be Purchased Without Intelligence. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002. DEMPSTER, A. Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, [s.l.], v. 38, n. 2, p. 325-339, 1967. DEMPSTER, Arthur P. A Generalization of Bayesian Inference. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, [s.l.], Technical Report n. 20, 1968. Disponível em: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/ fulltext/u2/664659.pdf. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2021. DEPRIT, A. Monsignor Georges Lemaitre. In: BERGER, A. L. (ed.). The Big Bang and Georges Lemaître. Louvain: Reidel, 1984. DERHAM, W. Physico-Theology. Chicago: Georg Olms Verlag, 1976. DESMOND, Adrian; MOORE, James. Darwin. London: Viking Penguin, 1991. DISCOVERY INSTITUTE [site institucional]. A Brief History. Seattle: Discovery, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.discovery.org/f/4441. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2021. DISCOVERY INSTITUTE. The Wedge Strategy. Seattle, [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://www.antievolution.org/features/wedge.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021. DUARTE, Fernando. Pablo Escobar: Why scientists want to kill Colombia's hippos. In: BBC [site institucional]. 20 out. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-56011594#:~:text=The%20rise%20of%20the%20so,country%2C%20but%20not% 20the%20hippos. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2021. DUBRAY, Charles Albert. Naturalism. In: ENCYCLOPEDIA CATHOLIC. Nova York: Robert Appleton, 1911. EAGLETON, Terry. The death of universities. In: THE GUARDIAN. Opinion. 17 dez. 2010. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/dec/17/death-universities-malaise-tuition-fees. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2021. EBERLIN, Marcos. Eles desafiam Darwin. Istoé, São Paulo, n. 2689, 2014. Disponível em: https://istoe.com.br/393404_ELES+DESAFIAM+DARWIN/. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2021. ECKLUND, Elaine Howard. Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. EHRICH, Dorothy; PER ERIK, Jorde. High Genetic Variability Despite High-Amplitude Population Cycles in Lemmings. Journal of Mammalogy, [s.l.], v. 86, n. 2, p. 380-385, 2005. Disponível em: https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-mammalogy/scope-and-details. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2020. EINSTEIN, Albert. The Evolution of Physics. Cambridge: University Press, 1938. EMILY, Rodriguez. Verifiability principle. In: ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA [site institucional]. England, 1998. Disponível em: https://www.britannica.com/topic/verifiability-principle. Acesso em: 01 jun. 2020. ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA [site institucional]. Neo-darwinismo. Chicago: Britannica, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.britannica.com/science/neo-Darwinism. Acesso em: 03 dez. 2020. FELIX, Marcus Minucius. The Octavius of Minucius Felix. New York: Orthodox Ebook, 2010. FLINN, M. V. Culture and the Evolution of Social Learning. Evolution and Human Behavior. Missouri: Elsevier, 1997. FONTENROSE, Joseph. Python: A Study of Delphic Mith and Its Origin. New York: Biblo and Tannen Publishers, 1974. FOX, Michael Allen. The Accessible Hegel. Prometheus Book, New York, 2005. FREIRE, Paulo. Carta de Paulo Freire aos Professores. Estudos avançados, São Paulo, v. 15, n. 42, p. 259-268, 2001. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S0103-40142001000200013&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 23 set. 2020. FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2011. FRIEDMAN, Michael. Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. GALILEO, Galilei. Carta a senhora Cristina de Lorena, grã-duquesa da Toscana. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, [s.l.], v. 5, p. 91-123, 1983. GALLUP [site institucional]. In Us, Belief in Creationism View of Humans at New Low. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.gallup.com/poll/210956/belief-creationist-view-humans-new-low.aspx. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021. GARNER, Julie. No Such Thing as “junk” DNA. In: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON [site institucional], 2012. Disponível em: https://magazine.washington.edu/feature/no-such-thing-as-junk-dna-researchers-say/#:~:text=For%20decades%20most%20scientists%20thought,% E2%80%94was%20%E2%80%9Cjunk%20DNA.%E2%80%9D. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2021. GAUTHIER, Peter. Does Weismann’s Experiment Constitute a Refutation of this Lamarckian Hypothesis? Bios, [s.l.], v. 61, n. 1, p. 6-8, 1990. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/4608123. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2020. GEARY, D. C. The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2004. GEISON, Gerald L. Darwin and heredity: the evolution of his hypothesis of pangenesis. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 4, p. 375-411, 1969. Acesso em: http://www.blc.arizona.edu/courses/schaffer/449/Soft%20Inhertance/Geison%20-%20Pangenesis.pdf. Acesso em: 23 set. 2020. GIANEZINI, Quelen. O Processo de Expansão do Ensino Superior em Mato Grosso. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009. Disponível em: http://flacso.redelivre.org.br/files/2012/07/490.pdf. Acesso em 23 set. 2020. GLOBO [site institucional]. Novo Presidente da CAPES gera polêmica ao defender criacionismo. Rio de Janeiro, 28 jan. 2020. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/jornal-nacional/noticia/2020/01/28/novo-presidente-da-capes-gera-polemica-ao-defender-criacionismo.ghtml. Acesso em: 27 set. 2020. GODFREY-SMITH Peter. Theory and Reality. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2003. GONZALEZ, Guillermo; RICHARDS, Jay W. The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery. Washington: Regnery Publishing, 2004. GOODENOUGH, Ursula. The Sacred Depths of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. GOULD, Stephen Jay. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2002. GOULD, Stephen Jay. The Panda’s Thumb. New York: Norton, 1982. GRAFF, Gerald. To Debate or Not to Debate Intelligent Design? In: INSIDE HIGHER ED [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://insidehighered.com/views/2005/09/28/graff. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2021. GRANT, R. E. Carta 3150. Destinatário: C. R. DARWIN. [s.l.], 1861. 1 carta. GREGORY, Andrew. Anaximander: A Re-assessment. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. GRIFFITHS, P. Creation Days and Orthodox Jewish Tradition. In: CREATION [site institucional], 2007. p. 53-55. Disponível em: https://creation.com/creation-days-and-orthodox-jewish-tradition. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021. GUNN, Shannon. Human Genome Project: Triumph or failure? In: FRONT LINE GENOMICS [site institucional], 26 ago. 2020. Disponível em: https://frontlinegenomics.com/human-genome-project-triumph-or-failure/. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2021. HAILPERIN, Theodore. Sentential Probability Logic: Origins, Development, Current Status, and Technical Applications. London: Associated University Press, 1996. HALL, Brian K; HALLGRÍMSSOM, Benedikt. Strickberger’s Evolution. 5. ed. Burlington: Jones & Bartlet, 2013. HALL, Sthephen S. Revolution Postponed: Why the Human Genome Project Has Been Disappointing. Scientific American, [s.l.], n. 10, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/revolution-postponed/. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2021. HALLAUER, Arnel R. Evolution of Plant Breeding. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, [s.l.], v. 11, p. 197-206, 2011. HANKINSON, R. J. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. HANSSON, Sven. ZALTA, Edward. Science and Pseudo-Science. In: STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/pseudo-science/#KarPop. Acesso em: 02 jun. 2020. HARPER, Douglas. Science. In: ONLINE ETYMOLOGY DICTIONARY [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.etymonline.com/word/science#etymonline_v_22918. Acesso em: 01 jun. 2020. HARRIS, C. Leon. Evolution: Gênesis and Revelations: With Readings from Empedocles to Wilson. Nova York: State of New York Press, 1981. HAWKING, Stephen. A Brief History of Time. London: Bantam Books, 1988. HEDRICK, U. P. (ed.). Sturtevant's Notes on Edible Plants. v. 2, parte II. New York: J. B. Lyon, 1919. p. 1-11. HENDRY, Andrew. Evolutionary Biology in Biodiversity Science, Conservation, And Policy: A Call To Action. International Journal of Organic Evolution, [s.l.], v. 64, n. 5, 1517-1528, 2010. HODGSON, G. M. Generalizing Darwinism to Social Evolution: Some Early Attempts. Journal of Economic Issues. [s.l.], v. 39, n. 4, p. 899-914, 2005. HOLZ, Carsten A. World university rankings are rewarding totalitarianism. In: UNIVERSITY WORLD NEWS [site institucional]. 17 abr. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20210413131504585. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2021. HUXLEY, Thomas. On the animals which are most nearly intermediate between birds and reptiles. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. p. 66-75, 1868. HUXLEY, Julian. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin, 1942. IBN, Khaldūn. The Muqaddimah. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967. IDEA Center [site institucional]. FAQ: Does intelligent design completely reject Darwinian evolution? [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/ showdetails.php/id/1153. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2021. IDEA Center [site institucional]. FAQ: Does intelligent design contribute to other fields of science? [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/ showdetails.php/id/1499. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2021. JOHNSTON, Ian C. And Still We Evolve: A Handbook for the Early History of Modern Science. Nanaimo: Malaspina University College, 1999. Disponível em: http://johnstoi.web.viu.ca// darwin/sect3.htm. Acesso em: 01 dez. 2020. JUSTIA US LAW [site institucional]. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Dist., 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). Pennsylvania, 20 dez. 2005. Disponível em: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/400/707/2414073/. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021. KAHNEMAN, Daniel; TVERSKY, Amos. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, v. 3, n. 3, p. 430-454, 1972. KIRK, Geoffrey; RAVEN, John E; SCHOFIELD, Malcolm. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983. KIROS, Teodros. Explorations in African Political Thought: Identity, Community, Ethics. New York: Routledge, 2001. KOOK, Abraham Isaac. Orot Hakodesh, book ll. [s.d.]. Disponível em: http://www.myjewishlearning.com/ideas_belief/science/Creation/Inflation/Kook.htm. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2021. KREBS, Robert E. Groundbreaking Scientific Experiments, Inventions, and Discoveries Through the Ages. London: Greenwood Press, 2004. KUHN, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. KUHN, Thomas. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1998. LAKATOS, I.; FEYERABEND, P.; MOTTERLINI, M. For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. LARSON, Edward J. Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory. Nova York: Modern Library, 2004. LATHAM, Jhonatan. The failure of the genome. In: THE GUARDIAN [site institucional], 17 abr. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/17/human-genome-genetics-twin-studies. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2021. LAUDAN, Larry. The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, v. 76, n. 3, p. 111-127, 1983. Disponível em: https://philarchive.org/ archive/LAUTDO-4v1. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2021. LAYTON, Richard A. Didymus the Blind and His Circle in Late-antique Alexandria: Virtue and Narrative in Biblical Scholarship. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 2004. LEIFCHILD, J. R. [Review of] On the origin of species. Athenaeum, [s.l.], n. 1673, p. 659-660. Disponível em: http://darwinonline.org.uk/converted/Ancillary/1859_Leifchild_A506.html. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2020. LIU, Youngsheng. A New Perspective on Darwin’s PanGênesis. Biological Reviews, Cambridge, v. 83, p. 141-149, 2008. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00036.x. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2021. LLOYD, Geofrey. Magic Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. LLOYD, Geofrey. Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. LLOYD, Geofrey. The Revolutions of Wisdon: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986. LOEB, L. E. A Companion to Hume. London: John Wiley and Sons, 2010. LONGO, Giuseppe; MONTÉVIL, Maël. Randomness Increases Order in Biological Evolution. Computation, Physics and Beyond, Berlin, v. 7160, p. 289-308, 2012. LORENZ, K. Behind the mirror: a search for the natural history of human knowledge. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978. LUCAS, J. R. Wilberforce and Huxley: a Legendary Encounter. The Historical Journal, [s.l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 313-330, 1979. MACKENZIE [site institucional]. Maior expoente do Design Inteligente palestra no Mackenzie. São Paulo, 16 out. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.mackenzie.br/noticias/ artigo/n/a/i/maior-expoente-do-design-inteligente-palestra-no-mackenzie/ Acesso em: 27 set. 2020. MAIMONIDES. The Guide for the Perplexed. 2:17. In: SEFARIA.ORG [site institucional]. 1919. Disponível em: http://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed,_Part_2.25.2?lang=bi. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2020. MATHEZ, Edmond A. Earth: Inside and out. American Museum of Natural History Book. Nova York: New Press, 2001. MATZKE, Nick. Critique: Of Pandas and People. In: NATIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND EDUCATION [site institucional], 2004. Disponível em: http://ncse.com/creationism/ analysis/critique-pandas-people. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021. MAYR, Ernst. The Philosophical Foundations of Darwinism. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Filadélfia, v. 145, n. 4, p. 488-495, 2001. Disponível em: www.jstor.org/stable/1558188. Acesso: 03 jan. 2021. MAYR, Ernst; PROVINE, W. B. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. MCLEOD, Donald. Dawkins Criticises “spread” of Creationism. The Guardian. 19 jun. 2002. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2002/jun/19/schools.aslevels. Acesso em: 06 abr. 2020. MCPHERRAN, Mark. The Religion of Socrates. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996. MEAGHER, Thomas R. Evolution and Today's Society, BioScience, [s.l.], v. 49, n. 11, p. 923-923, 1999. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2307/1313651. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021. MULLER, HJ. Reversibility in Evolution Considered from the Standpoint of Genetics. Biological Reviews, Cambridge, v. 14, n. 3, p. 261-280, 1939. NAGEL, Thomas. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist NeoDarwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. New York. Oxford University Press, 2012. NEWTON, Isaac. Opticks. Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1706. NOBLE, D. Neo-Darwinism. The Modern Synthesis And Selfish Genes: Are They Of Use In Physiology? J. Physiol. [s.l.], v. 589, n. 5, p. 1007-1015, 2011. NOBLE, D. The Music of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. NUMBERS, Ronald. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. New York: Harvard University Press, 1992. NUSSBAUM, M. C. Aristotle de Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985. O’KEEFE, Madeleine. Fine-Tuning versus Naturalness. Simmetry Magazine, Batavia, 28 jan. [n.p.], 2020. Disponível em: https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/fine-tuning-versus-naturalness. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2021. OLOFSSON, P. Intelligent Design and Mathematical Statistics: A Troubled Alliance. Biology and Philosophy. [s.l.], v. 23, p. 545-553, 2008. Disponível em: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8def/d6c4582d252e55d8b4a188ccdb9bff6453c3.pdf. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2021. ORTEGA Y GASSET, José. Ideias e crenças. Campinas: Cedet, 2018. ORTEGA Y GASSET, José. Obras Completas, Vol I. Madrid: Taurus. 2004. PALEY, William. Natural Theology. 12. ed. London: Faulder, 1809. PALLEN, Mark J. The Rough Guide to Evolution. London: Rough Guides, 2009. PAPINEAU, David. Naturalism. In: STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008. PARK, Soo Bin. South Korea surrenders to creationist demands. Nature, n. 486, v. 14, [n.p.], 2012. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/486014a. Acesso em: 14 out. 2021. PENNOCK, Robert T. Tower of Babel. The Evidence against the New Creationism. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006. PLANTINGA, A. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. Cornell University Press, 1967. PLATO. Plato in Twelve Volumes, v. 9. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann, 1925. POPKIN, Richard Henry. The History of Scepticism: from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923. POPPER, Karl. Zwei Bedeutungen von Falsifizierbarkeit. In: SEIFFERT, Helmut; RADNITZKY, Gerard (Hrsg.): Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie. München: Ehrenwirth, 1989, p. 82-86. PORTER, Noah (ed.). Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary. Springfield: C. & G. Merriam, 1913. PRATT, William. Eliot at Oxford: From Philosopher to Poet and Critic. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, v. 78, n. 2, p. 321-337, 1995. QAFIH, Yosef. Sefer Yetzirah Hashalem. Jerusalém: The Committee for Publishing the Books of Rabbi Saadia Gaon, 1972. QUAMMEN, David. The Reluctant Mr. Darwin. London: Atlas Books, 2006. QUINE, Willard van Orman. Two Dogmas of Empiricism: The Philosophical Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951. RAMBAN. The Torah: with commentary translated, annotated, and elucidated. New Jersey: Artscroll Mesorah Publications, 2010. RAY, John. The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of the Creation. London: William Innys, 1717. RECHENBERG, Ingo. Evolutionsstrategie: Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog, 1973. RELIGIOUS INSTITUTE AT STAR ISLAND. The Portsmouth Herald. New Hampshire: IRAS, 1964, RESNIK, David B. A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Great Britain, v. 31, n. 2, p. 249-267, 2000. RICHARD, Owen. Review of Darwin’s Origin of Species. England: Edimburg Review, 1860. RONAN, Colin A. The Shorter Science and Civilization in China: An Abridgement by Colin A. Ronan of Joseph Needham’s Original Text. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995. RUSE, Michael. Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. SAADIA, Gaon. Sefer Yetzirah Hashalem. Jerusalém: The Committee for Publishing the Books of Rabbi Saadia Gaon, 1972. SAGAN, Carl. Cosmos. New York: Random House, 1980. SAGAN, Carl. The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York: Ballantine, 1997. SCHIFF, Brian. The Function of Narrative: Towards a Narrative Psychology of Meaning. Narrative Works, v. 2, n. 1, p. 33-47, 2012. SCHLEICHER, August. Darwinism Tested by the Science of Language. London: Hotten, 1869. SCOMOVITIS, Vassiliki Betty. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. SEDLEY, David. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. California: University of California Press, 2009. SEDLEY, David. Lucretius. In: STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY. Stanford: Stanford Press, 2013. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lucretius/. Acesso em: 01 dez. 2020. SEDWICK, Adam. Carta 2548. Destinatário: C. R. DARWIN. [s.l.], 1859. 1 carta. SHEA, Brendan. Karl Popper: Philosophy of Science. In: IEP [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.iep.utm.edu/pop-sci/#H3. Acesso em: 04 jun. 2020. SILK, Joe. Holistic Cosmology. Science Magazine, [s.l.], v. 277, n. 5326, p. 644, 1997. SLIFKIN, Natan. The Challenge of Creation. New York: Yashar Books, 2006. SLOAN, Phillip. Evolution. In: STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY. Stanford: Stanford Press, 2013. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/ entries/evolution/. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2020. SMITH, Q. The Reason the Universe Exists is that it Caused Itself to Exist. Philosophy, [s.l.], v. 74, p. 579-586, 1999. SMOLIN, Lee. The Life of the Cosmos. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. SPENCER, Herbert. Principles of Biology. London: Williams and Norgate, 1864. STANFORD ENCICLOPAEDIA [site institucional]. Phisicalism. Stanford, 2001. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2021. STANTON, I. C.; MURRAY, A. K.; ZHANG, L. Evolution of antibiotic resistance at low antibiotic concentrations including selection below the minimal selective concentration. Commun Biol, [s.l.], v. 3, [n.p.], 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01176-w. Acesso em: 03 mar. 2021. STEUP, Matthias. ZALTA, Edward N. Epistemology. In: STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY. Stanford: Stanford Press, 2005. Disponível em: http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/spr2014/entries/epistemology. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2020. STRAHLER, Arthur N. Understanding Science: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues. Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1992. STROLL, Avrun. Epistemology. In: ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA [site institucional]. Chicago: Britannica, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology. Acesso em: 07 abr. 2021. SWINBURNE, Richard. The Existence of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. TAYLOR, Charles. Uma era secular. São Leopoldo: Unisinos, 2010. TAYLOR, Charles. Defining Science: A Rethoric of Demarcation. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996. THOMSOM, Keith Stewart. Huxley, Wilberforce and the Oxford Museum. American Scientist, London, v. 88, n. 3, p. 210-213, 2000. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27858018. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2021. TODES, Daniel Philip. Darwin without Malthus the struggle for existence in Russian evolutionary thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. TOOBY, J.; COSMIDES, L. Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology. In: The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken: John Wiley, 2005, p. 5-67. TORREY, Fuller. Was the Human Genome Project a dud? Two decades later, it has become clear that the Human Genome Project was vastly oversold. In: THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS [site institucional], 13 out. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.dallasnews.com/ opinion/commentary/2019/10/13/was-the-human-genome-project-a-dud/. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2021. ULETT, Mark A. Making the case for ortoghenesis: The popularization of definetely directed evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Species, [s.l.], v. 45, n. 3, p. 124-132, 2014. Disponível em: https://ur.booksc.eu/book/25087512/b43788. Acesso em: 15 set. 2020. WAGGONER, Ben. Medieval and Renaissance Concepts of Evolution and Paleontology. In: BERKELEY [site institucional]. California, [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/medieval.html Acesso em: 01 dez. 2020. WAISMANN, Brian. Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 1984. WALLACE. Carta 5140. Destinatário: C. R. DARWIN. [s.l.], 1866. Disponível em: http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-5140#back-mark-5140.f5. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2021. WARFIELD, Breckinridge Benjamin. Evolution, Science and Scripture. London Baker, 2000. WATSON, H. C. Carta 2540. Destinatário: C. R. DARWIN. [s.l.], 1859. 1 carta. WEBER, A. S. Nineteenth-Century Science: An Anthology. Peterborough, Canadá: Broadview Press, 2000. WELLS, Jonathan. The Myth of Junk DNA. In: DISCOVERY INSTITUTE [site institucional]. [s.d.]. Disponível em: https://www.discovery.org/b/the-myth-of-junk-dna/. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2021. WEYL, H. The Unity of Science. Mind and matter, selected writings on philosophy, mathematics and physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009. WHEWELL, William. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded Upon Their History. Cambridge: Cambridge, 1840. WIELAND, Carl. AiGs views on the Intelligent Design Movement. In: ANSWERSINGÊNESIS [site institucional]. 30 ago. 2002. Disponível em: http://www.answersinGênesis.org. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021. WILLIAMS, Raymond. Social Darwinism. Herbert Spencer: Critical Assessment. London: Routledge, 2000. WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Annalen der Naturphilosophie, Leipzig, v. 14, p. 185-262, 1921. WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Early Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010b. WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. New York: Cosimo Classics, 2010a. YEZIRAH, Sefer. In: THE JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA. New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 2013. YOUNG, Davis A. The Contemporary Relevance of Augustine’s View of Creation. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, [s.l.], v. 40, n. 1, p. 42-45, 1988. ZIRKLE, Conway. Natural Selection before the “Origin of Species”. American Philosophical Society, [s.l.], v. 84, n. 1, p. 71-123, 1941. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/984852. Acesso em: 01 dez. 2020. ZUCKERMAN, Harriet. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: The Free Press, 1977.pt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectCiênciapt_BR
dc.subjectReligiãopt_BR
dc.subjectTeoria do Design Inteligentept_BR
dc.subjectNeodarwinismopt_BR
dc.subject.cnpqCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::TEOLOGIApt_BR
dc.titleNEODARWINISMO E TEORIA DO DESIGN INTELIGENTE: IMPLICAÇÕES DAS NARRATIVAS PARA O CENÁRIO UNIVERSITÁRIOpt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências das Religiões

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
TCC - Geraldo Moysés Gazolli Junior.pdfTCC - Geraldo Moysés Gazolli Junior18,29 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Recomendar este item Visualizar estatísticas


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.